Saturday, July 30, 2016

A woman has died while bicycling on SE 82nd at Flavel

Intersection of 82nd and Flavel.

Intersection of 82nd and Flavel.

A woman died this morning as the result of a traffic collision in southeast Portland.

According to the Portland Police Bureau, it happened around 8:00 am this morning at the intersection of SE 82nd and Flavel.

Here’s a snip from the official police statement:

Officers and medical personnel arrived and located the adult female bicycle rider who was critically injured. Life-saving efforts were not successful and she died at the scene.

The adult male driver in a box truck remained at the scene and has been cooperating with investigators.

The Traffic Division’s Major Crash Team is responding to conduct an investigation.


The location is just a few blocks north of the Springwater Corridor path. Here’s an aerial view of the intersection:

82ndoverhead

When the City of Portland launched their Vision Zero initiative in August 2015, they chose a location on 82nd (at Division) just just 2.5 miles north of where this fatality occurred.

82nd has been identified by the Bureau of Transportation as one of Portland’s ‘High Crash Corridors’ — a designation given to 10 streets with a high concentration of crashes.

While specific details haven’t been released, the location of this crash is sure to re-ignite the frustration of Portlanders who want to tame these big and fast arterials. Vivian Satterfield, deputy director of the nonprofit OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon just posted her feelings to her personal Twitter account:

This is the third fatal crash involving a bicycle rider in Portland this year.

If you have information about this collision or about this intersection in general, please share in the comments or get in touch with us directly at (503) 706-8804.

Stay tuned as more details are released.

— Jonathan Maus, (503) 706-8804 – jonathan@bikeportland.org

Our work is supported by subscribers. Please become one today.

The post A woman has died while bicycling on SE 82nd at Flavel appeared first on BikePortland.org.



from Front Page – BikePortland.org http://ift.tt/2aEChEB

Friday, July 29, 2016

Who’s mad and who’s glad about ‘Better Naito’?

Naito Parkway traffic observations -13.jpg
Naito Parkway on Thursday afternoon as seen looking north from the Morrison Bridge.
(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

This weekend, the City of Portland plans to remove the temporary multi-use path from the eastern side of Naito Parkway so the space can be used by cars instead.

It slowed rush-hour northbound auto trips somewhat: by about 1.5 minutes in the morning and between 30 seconds and two minutes in the evening, according to an independent analysis requested by The Oregonian and published Friday. (That’s for someone traveling all the way from I-405 to NW Everett.)

On the other hand, the project vastly improved the experience of biking or walking on Naito, especially during the summer festivals in which Waterfront Park is fenced up to the edge of the curb. In past years, people typically spill into the bike lane, forcing bikes into the auto lane, and the waterfront path regularly becomes almost impassable by bike because so many people are walking there.

So for politicians, here’s the question: How do you weigh the benefits of depressurizing the waterfront path and increasing the appeal of biking and walking downtown against the costs of increasing delay for people driving?

In short: how much were people who drive ticked off by those additional minutes of delay?

Well, out of the 10,400 people who drive northbound on Naito on the average weekday, exactly 45 sent either a voicemail or an email to the city opposing the project’s congestion effects. Just for fun, let’s look at that on a chart:

did not complain

“I work in Portland Monday-Friday,” wrote Paula Beard. “I drive North on Naito Parkway to Davis, then to 8th and Glisan. My evening commute has not been impacted by the Northbound Naito lane closure, but my morning commute time is greatly increased. I timed it today—25 minutes from the time I merged to Naito on the South end to when I arrived at the Davis Street stoplight. Without the lane closure it is about 5-10 minutes.”

Now, obviously there were many people annoyed by the Naito change who didn’t take the time to contact the city about the plan. Feedback like this is a better indicator of how many people are passionate about a policy — potentially to the extent that it’d influence their vote.

But in that case, we also need to consider the number of people who sent emails or voicemails supporting the project’s biking and walking benefits. We don’t have good data on how many people bike or walk on Naito, unfortunately, but a total of 65 people contacted the city since Better Naito was installed to express support for the idea. So here’s another chart:

direct feedback

The city also got a handful of letters and voicemails from people discussing design issues with the temporary path, such as trucks parking there or confusion about where bikes should turn. Those aren’t counted in this analysis unless they also mentioned general support for or opposition to the general change.

To be fair, all but nine of those positive comments came over the last week, when some biking advocates organized a letter-writing campaign in anticipation of the project being removed. But of course that only happened because someone was motivated to take the time to organize a letter-writing campaign … and because 56 people apparently cared enough to join that campaign even before the trial was removed.

“I’ve heard rumors that Better Naito is being torn out this weekend,” wrote Evan Heidtmann in an email to the city Tuesday. “Why would this happen? It doesn’t make any sense to me. I enjoyed riding on Naito this summer and I don’t know of anyone who wants it to go back to the way it was. Our waterfront is one of the best things going and we need to make it a great place to be, not a giant sewer for people driving fast in their cars. Everyone has already figured out how to use the street in its new configuration. Changing it now will just lead to confusion, frustration, and increased dangers for everyone on the street.”

By contrast, most of the negative feedback arrived at the start of the project; only nine of the 45 negative comments arrived in the last week.

Here are 19 more examples of things people had to say to the city about Naito, released to BikePortland after a public-records request. We’re publishing positive and negative feedback in the same ratio that the city received: about 60 percent positive.

Subject: Better, Better Naito

Dear Mayor and City Council – I have been loving the Better Naito project and had no idea it wasn’t going to become permanent! If there is a jewel of downtown Portland, it is the waterfront. I have taken family and friends there from Ohio, California, Colorado, Iowa and of course Portland, and everyone loves it. Having the security to ride and walk along more safely has been a great improvement, especially when there are thousands of people at the many events there.

What other city would do this grand experiment with traffic control? I congratulate you for conducting experiments like this and risking the wrath of other commuters. The investigative work is essentially done, and now we need to take it to the next step and make it permanent.

I love that we live in a city that is so progressive and tries things like this. And I agree with people who say we can’t really pave our way out of our new traffic problems, so where we can, let’s continue facilitating active transportation so that it becomes part of our lives.

Sincerely,

Rob Hertert

Subject: Commuting from SW to NE

Hello,

Just some feedback about clogged arteries. I am sure your office is aware of the worsening of traffic conditions in the past few years. I live in NE Portland and work on SW Macadam, a 6 mile commute by car. Whether due to new residents or tourists, the traffic on I5 and 405 has ramped up considerably. It can take 45 minutes for me to get home in the worst of the traffic jams. Naito Parkway has been an alternative option for me to use when the freeways are at a standstill. The blocked easternmost lane has created yet another traffic log jam. I see drivers taking unnecessary risks. The other day I saw a van driving down the blocked lane. The pedestrian flow was in Waterfront Park with people crossing Naito at lights or marked crossing points. I did not see people using the blocked lane as a walking space. The lane was empty. This experiment in blocking a lane of a main artery seems frivolous and potentially dangerous.

I have lived in NE Portland since 1980, long before it became trendy, and love its walkability. However, I am increasingly concerned about the liveability of the city as a whole. We have had a huge influx of people without the transportation infrastructure to move them quickly.

Jan Volkin
NE Portland

Subject: Commuter Experience

Heya! I heard your soliciting feedback on the Naito bike route.

I am a 100% car commuter. I drive from North Portland into SW downtown for work, dropping my kids off at school and daycare on the way. I don’t have time to bike to work, regardless of how nice or big the bike is …

… And I *LOVE* the bike path. It doesn’t significantly impact my commute time, I see tons of cyclists using it every day, it helps keep the waterfront pedestrian path clear and safe, and I think it’s the right thing for out growing city!!

Regarding the folks who complain about traffic snarls: in my experience, the #1 jam is the Hawthorne bridge on ramp from Naito. Everything else moves at a pretty steady clip. Opening up the Naito bike line to vehicular traffic isn’t a solution to any of the traffic problems I’ve seen. At best it’s a short term solution to the same congestion, whereas a bike path can accommodate many, many more commuters!

I’m thinking about the continuous development in the north Pearl, the south waterfront, and the upcoming inner SE — all need access, and all are extremely bikeable. Let’s set the right precedence and make our city even more friendly to cyclists …

And I say this as a 100% downtown car commuter!

Thanks,
-Peat Bakke

Subject: Please keep BetterNaito!

I’ve followed the instructions on your website and tweeted my thanks for #BetterNaito, but tonight I’ve learned that there is a chance that we can keep it.

Please, please, please! This would be great for family biking. Just last week we had a biking family visiting from Seattle and it was wonderful to be able to get to the BoltBus stop easily from the Hawthorne Bridge and then use it to connect to the path to the Tillicum. Lots of visitors want to ride the Tillicum and BetterNaito was a great, low-stress way to get there on our cargo bikes.

For those of us that don’t venture over the river to the westside very often, it’s hard to find a low-stress way to get where we do need to go. This is so helpful. My bakfiets weighs 90 pounds before the kids get in it with all their gear, so we need a flat or downhill route to get where we are going. BetterNaito lets me ride at my speed (I average 4 mph) without inconveniencing people walking or people biking faster than that. And it’s so flat!

I’m looking forward to taking the kids to Jamison Square if you keep it. I hope you do.

Thank you,
Kathleen Youell

Subject: A Joy

Hi!

Thought I’d take a moment to say how much this project means to me. Traveling between SE to NW Portland is made easier when I can stay on the East side of Naito. This makes getting on and off the bridge easier. I wish it would carry on through the winter. I typically take the Eastbank home after work in the summer but when winter rolls around it’s too dark and I take Naito. Riding South on the West side of Naito, I have to watch the parked cars since they may pull out or open doors without warning. Also, it can be stressful to get across Naito at the Salmon St fountain to get to the Hawthorne bridge.

Thank you for taking the time to read my message. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Be well,
Siobhan

Subject: Please make Better Naito permanent

I just heard that the opening of Better Naito to pedestrians/cyclists/skaters is coming to an end this Sunday. This lane has made life better for so many at so little a cost. Walking down on the shared path by the water is so much safer and more welcome for the elderly and families and tourists. Meanwhile faster moving thru-cyclists, runners and skaters have taken to Better Naito to move through more efficiently without disturbing their fellow Portlanders. It really has been marvelous. I drive through here too and I have not noticed any significant change in the driving time.

There is limited capacity and growing demand for human-powered movement in this area. Better Naito eases both problems elegantly and inexpensively. This is future thinking. Please make it permanent.

Best,
William Rausch

Subject: “better naito” is not better

Regarding “better naito.” It seems like a nice idea, but really, it is a mess.

Your website has too much positive spin and doesn’t speak realistically. Fact is, delays are more like 10 minutes – you cite 45 seconds to 1 minute. Try again. I take the route daily and know this for a fact. Your website states there is a sign alerting drivers ahead of time – barely noticeable. But again – the alternate route adds 10 minutes.

Your solution only help bikes/peds even though you say “more connected way for all Oregonians.” What about people who are trying to get to work DURING A REGULAR MORNING WHEN THERE IS NO FESTIVAL? It is a ridiculous concept to create a traffic jam and a mess of construction cones during these times. How did anyone think this was smart?

A better solution that would indeed benefit all Oregonians using downtown would be to erect the lanes during festival HOURS only. Simple, efficient, smart for all.

Anita

Subject: Better Naito
Hello Mayor and City Commissioners;

I am an internal medicine physician at OHSU and bike to the tram every day from my home in NE Portland. I am writing to express my sincere and heartfelt support for the Better Naito project. Although there are certainly other areas of the city which sorely need bike infrastructure attention, I have personally experienced how the conversion of Naito the last several months has benefited a huge number of Portlanders and visitors to our great city- bicyclists and pedestrians alike. I can’t help but smile every time I bike down Naito now. Seriously!

I appreciate the hard work you all do on a daily basis for Portland (despite the complaints and grumblings of many). This project is important for you to support and I feel that it (and other bike and pedestrian friendly projects across the city) enhance what is already such a great place to live.

Best,

Joe Hardman, MD

Subject: Make #BetterNaito permanent!

Hello City of Portland representatives,

Today I write you to make my appeal for keeping the #BetterNaito changes permanent. It has been absolutely wonderful to have this dedicated cycle and pedestrian path for the last few months. I ride my bike five days a week from Inner SE to Naito and NW 9th Ave and this segment is crucial for my commute.

It has been wonderful to have this alternative bike path available, especially in the summer time. There is no easy traffic-free way for me to make an efficient north/south commute from the Pearl to the Hawthorne bridge except on this path. The festivals that take place on the Esplanade during the summer months make riding near impossible with people who are leisurely trying to enjoy those festivals and the park. Similarly, riding on the East side Esplanade is also extremely difficult. There are many people enjoying this space in a leisurely way and it does not feel very safe for me or for them to use these paths for my bicycle commute where I am often riding very fast.

Having said that, I’ll leave you with a few more points for consideration

– The four permanent lanes of auto traffic on Naito have access to the road for 8760 hours a year. I’m sure traffic volume studies show that this road can certainly afford to permanent lose a lane. Let’s get real and give cyclists a piece of that 8760 hour pie.

– The distance we’re talking about is a mere 0.70 miles. In the grand scheme of trips via automobile on this road, that is like a drop of water in the ocean. For cycling commuters, that can be a much more significant percentage of their commute.

– I ride five days a week all year long. I see the volume of traffic every day on Naito during peak hours. Northbound traffic can certainly support the change. Congestion is not that bad.

– I’ve also ridden for the last eight years using the Esplanade. I can tell you having more cyclists on this pathway will NOT work. I’ve seen it from both perspectives – as a pedestrian trying to dodge cyclists and as a cyclist trying to go to and from work. If it were not for #BetterNaito, I would simply divert to another street (3rd Ave). Riding on the bike path on Naito now really sucks, as there are at least nine traffic lights that kill my trip.

– This would be a tremendous sign of support from the city about taking cycling seriously. You’ve already got some great momentum with Biketown, closing the Naito gap, Ankeny Plaza. Keep the transformations coming!

– I’m invested in my city and my community. I am a tax-paying homeowner in Portland that wants to see my city work for me

Thank you for your time,
Evan Reeves

From: Jared Lorz
Subject: You suck
I have had to walk on dirt sidewalks and unpaved dilapidated streets for 30 years because you bastards won’t improve southwest Portland. Screw downtown and your little initiatives.

Subject: Bike lanes vs cars. Naito Parkway and foster and holgate.

You guys are idiots. If you want people to come to the festivals, more parking for CARS and lanes for CARS are needed. I used to live in portland and now won’t come to any of your festivals nor will any of my friends of family because you have let the bicyclist take over the roads that we ALL pay for. And yes I still work in portland and still pay taxes there but have moved across the river to a state that is CAR friendly for commuters.

Jason Lind

Subject: Please Keep #BetterNaito!

Hello oh transportational powers that be!

I heard through Twitter that #BetterNaito is scheduled to end on 7/31. I think this a terrible idea and here is why:

1) BetterNaito has helped to reduce car/bike and bike/ped conflicts on Naito and the Waterfront Path.

2) We are all used to it already. I drive 60-70% and bike 30-40%, and Naito seems fine to me. I often have to visit hotels on the waterfront for my job, and I haven’t seen any unusual or commerce-ending congestion, just the typical rush hour stuff that passes if you just chill for a few minutes — as we all should.

3) We don’t want to backslide into a car-centric downtown. It doesn’t make sense to say Portland is committed to #VisionZero if we are going to take away something that creates bike/ped safety!

4) There isn’t another really good north-south bike path in downtown until 14th Ave.

5) There are so many upcoming events on the waterfront throughout the fall, winter, and spring — from Portland Marathon, to Jingle Bell Run, to Shamrock Run — it doesn’t make sense to make everyone unlearn BetterNaito when it’s just going to go back in again in the summer, and when we have so many downtown events that BetterNaito helps. Let’s keep our vibrant downtown a year-round vibrant downtown!

Please — make BetterNaito permanent and help make Portland, Oregon into the multimodal utopia we want to be.

Thank you!

Emee Pumarega
Mom
Business Owner
Car Driver
Cyclist

Subject: KEEP BETTER NAITO

Hello,

I’m writing to ask that you strongly consider keeping Better Naito permanently. I’ve worked downtown for over a decade & often bike commuted from Milwaukie to downtown on a daily basis. Although the frequency of my commute has lessened I still commute using the same route every other week and often ride downtown for errands or shopping (Powell’s Books!). Riding my bike on Naito has been way too frightening so the majority of the time I’ve used waterfront park to connect from Hawthorne bridge to the US Bancorp Tower. Riding the sidewalks with pedestrians, which has become more crowded over the years, is not ideal and poses its own dangers to cyclists, pedestrians, and the wildlife (I’ve personally witnessed a goose getting caught in wheels of a passing cyclist in waterfront sidewalk)! Additionally, at lunch time I often walk down waterfront park & experience from a pedestrian standpoint the stress of having cyclists passing, especially when large groups of people are congested in particular spots. Riding waterfront park during any event is almost impossible with limited access to reach the streets, fence obstructions, and vendor trucks/cars on sidewalk.

I had actually forgotten Better Naito was set up this year when I commuted into downtown one morning. How refreshing to be able to safely ride down Naito all the way to work (while shaving several minutes from commute time)!! I have since been able to enjoy Better Naito with my 8yo son, with groups of friends riding to events at Powell’s Books, and many other regular commutes to/from work. I have twice helped lost strangers find & ride Better Naito with me as a better way to reach Hawthorne Bridge or the Tillikum Crossing. Their response has always been “this is great!” and my reply is always “yes, it is!”

I do own & sometimes commute into downtown by car. There’s always the “change pains” as people get used to anything different but people adjust quickly & I’ve experienced little change in my car commute due to Better Naito. Additionally, I have other options in my car but I don’t have many other options on my bike!

Keep the positive change momentum going for our city & allow Better Naito to stay. Safe streets & spaces for PEOPLE (not just people in cars) is important to me.

Thank you.

~Kelly Williams

Subject: Better Naito

Dear Portland,
I want to throw my support behind better naito, the expanded bike lanes and pedestrian access has been awesome.

Let me start by saying I am not a Portland resident. I am a frequent (monthly visitor to Portland because I LOVE what an amazing city the people of Portland have created.

Why do I come every month and stay downtown and spend money?
Do you realize that in the last 25 years Portland has transformed into one of the most unique and amazing North American Cities?
1. I can take MAX from PDX to downtown and then get around on public transit
2. I can now get bikeshare, but before rent bikes and get all over most of the central city without any hassles
3. I can walk to a lot of areas of downtown easily and without hassle.

Do you realize how UNIQUE that is in north America? Only New York City and Chicago offer those same options.. possibly San Francisco, but they’re Californians.

Please keep on being amazing and keep Naito with less cars.. it is an obstacle for bikes and pedestrians to get to the waterfront and yes that bike lane is an awesome North-South route between bridges.

Thanks for being awesome and please stay that way! Keep or reinstate better Naito!

Regards
Mike Cipriano


Subject: Naito Parkway Lane Closure

Dear City of Portland Officials,

I am a 21 year resident of the City, having lived in SW Portland (close-in) for the first 9 years, and in the Alameda neighborhood for the past 11 years. When my wife and I were looking for a home in close-in NE to raise our children, we chose to live on bike way – we are proud supporters of shared transportation resources, and appreciate the relatively new bike/ped-only arrangement the City constructed next to the Madeleine School. For years, I commuted to work by bike whenever possible. Now, I work in SW Portland close to Lake Oswego, and must commute by car.

Due partially (perhaps mostly) to people moving to the Portland area, my evening commute has, rather quickly, worsened from about 40 minutes (1 1/2 years ago) to about 50-55 minutes today. I select my route depending on the day, but find that the Interstates have become unbearable, particularly when I-5 is backed up from Barbur Blvd to the Washington border. One of the routes I take is North on Naito Pkwy, crossing the river at the Steel Bridge. Unfortunately, the summer lane closure on Naito Blvd has created traffic congestion that has worsened commutes even more.

I have been an ardent supporter of the City, and have never complained. However, the Naito Pkwy lane closure does not make good sense to me. I have read through the Better Naito materials, but can’t understand why closing one lane to vehicle traffic solves the problems that the closure is intended to solve. A wonderful bike/ped facility already exists along the river bank, very close to Naito Pkwy. Why do we need two North-South bike paths so close to one another? My experience has been that the bike lane next to me is rarely used. I believe that this is a poor use of a valuable and important transportation resource.

I have witnessed many times pedestrians gingerly walking on the curb or in the painted bike lane during waterfront events. This is obviously a dangerous and unacceptable situation. But, the question is; why not move the barrier on the West side of the event venue farther to the East, creating a path in the park for pedestrians to safely travel to/from the event? Why does the event venue barrier have to abut the roadway? Bikes can continue to use the river side path. Further, the event venue can be reduced in size to accommodate a pedestrian path along side Naito Pkwy. A fence could even be erected to keep pedestrians from wandering into the roadway.

In light of the ever increasing gridlock around this City, closing important arterial streets to vehicle traffic should be avoided. In the case of the Naito Pkwy lane closure, a valuable and needed roadway is being blocked to address problems that could be addressed in other, more effective, ways. I request that the City reconsider this short-term and potentially, long term lane closure, and look at other options for addressing pedestrian and cyclist safety during summer events.

David Carter

Subject: Naito Pilot Feedback
Hello,

I would like to provide feedback on the Naito pilot. While I respect and understand the concept of increasing the ease for bike commuters, it is not possible for all of us to bike to work. Even though I am a resident of Portland and Multnomah County, I need to drive to work due to job requirements (the ability to travel to meetings in Salem and other locations with little notice) as well as childcare restrictions/hours. The lane closure has nearly doubled my commute time and increased my carbon footprint notably. Alternative routes require me to backtrack and idle more than the commute I previously took via two open lanes on Naito.

I find it additionally frustrating that I have been run off the sidewalk twice and hit by one bicycle while jogging on the waterfront during the lunch hour in the past two weeks. Even with the loss of the lane and increased commute time to give the bicycles an alternative route, I do not see bikes using the lane when I do take Naito and I have not seen a decrease in bike traffic along the waterfront walkways.

Please consider what the convenience of even more bike lanes (there are already bike lanes on both sides of Naito and a bike/walkway through the park) is doing to hard working families who are already doing what they can within reason for the environment and attempts at reducing road time. I hear my shared frustrations regularly from coworkers and friends. – I beg you not to chase honest hard working people and families out of Portland.

Thank you for providing the opportunity to voice my concerns and frustrations as a Portland native, Multnomah County tax payer/homeowner, and participant in paying the increasing fuel tax.

Respectfully,
Gail Hammer

Subject: Naito Parkway Improvements

Hi Commissioner Novick,

I am very excited to see the improvements made to Naito Parkway! Thank you and PBOT for your support on this project. I do think it is essential to make the Better Blocks project permanent as well, even if it is temporarily just paint and/or cones. I envision an easy to use bikeway for all ages starting from the S. Waterfront extending all the way to Naito and NW 17th. This would enable easy access from east of the Willamette to anywhere on the west, whether it be NW 21st/23rd, the Pearl, Downtown or the South Waterfront. Essentially, this would form the backbone of downtown’s protected bicycle network. Maybe this is your vision too. I’m excited for the many great things coming to Portland. Thanks for your leadership.

Sincerely,
Alex Gerace

Subject: Stop the insanity!

Seriously……A group of PSU students come up with a concept plan which calls for the closing of ½ of one of our city’s major arterials. The arterial which allows drivers to bypass the city’s congested core. It is tested last summer during three weeks of generally lower traffic volume due to summer vacations and such. The “Better Naito Summary Report” indicates that north bound traffic is only affected by 45 seconds to 1 minutes with the heaviest delay between Clay and Main due to the merging traffic.

Well, I would like to share with someone my experience of yesterday and today since the closing of Northbound Naito. I work in the Koin Tower on Clay. I commute in my car via Barbour Blvd. I use Front/Naito and turn right onto Clay. Yesterday the traffic northbound was stopped and heavy just north of SW Sheridan at 8:02am. I was able to finally turn left onto Clay at 8:15am. 13 minutes. Today, same route, traffic stopped and heavy just south of SW Sheridan at 8:12. I turned left onto Clay at 8:27. 15 minutes. There is a very large amount of traffic now attempting to turn off of Naito onto Clay and the other westbound streets leading into the core area to apparently attempt to avoid the delay on Naito.

$1.5 in the Mayor’s budget to screw things up. Here is a concept. Spend the money on……wait for it……a sidewalk next to the roadway. Why have we always had grass right up to the curb? Don’t take the road away. Lose ten feet of the grass and make everyone happy.

I can appreciate the difficult job you folks at PDOT have trying to make everyone happy, while at the same time building and providing a system that functions well.
I am certain that your department is monitoring the situation. Please use my input as constructive criticism.

Regards,
Neil Jaques
SW Portland Resident

Subject: PLEASE MAKE “BETTER NAITO” PERMANENT

Dear Mayor Hales and Commissioners Fish, Fritz, Novick, and Saltzman:

With only a week left before it is scheduled to be removed, Better Naito pilot project should be retained indefinitely. Further, I encourage you to find and allocate the funds to permanently transform as much of Naito Parkway as possible for safe use by non-motorized transportation modes (pedestrian, skateboard, roller skating, bicycling, etc).

Tom McCall Waterfront Park is emblematic of our City’s historic efforts to reclaim auto thoroughfares for non-motorized public use. Extending this into Naito Parkway today extends our commitment to Portland’s car-free future.

Making Better Naito permanent is also desirable for the following reasons:
• The existing multi-use path along the waterfront is increasingly overcrowded. An alternate pathway will prevent potentially dangerous collisions between pedestrians and more quickly moving skaters and cyclists.
• Naito Parkway eventually narrows to one-lane only 7/10 of mile further down the road; we’re not reducing congesting, only postponing it.
• This is a low-investment infrastructure project with immediate, high-visibility benefits.
• The economic impacts will undoubtedly be net positive for merchants on this street and connecting streets on the eastern edge of downtown. Very little freight passes through this corridor. • • Locals and tourists alike will enjoy Naito Parkway as a recreational promenade, which is far more lucrative for our city than a commuter thoroughfare.
• Our streets in the city center should be for people first, not cars. Single-occupancy vehicle driver preferences should no longer be prioritized in our city’s transportation decision-making.

This repurposing of Naito Parkways is in line with our Comprehensive and Climate Action Plans; please, let’s put our words into action.

Thank you for your service to our city and your consideration in the matter,
Sarah Iannarone

— Michael Andersen, (503) 333-7824 – michael@bikeportland.org

Our work is supported by subscribers. Please become one today.

The post Who’s mad and who’s glad about ‘Better Naito’? appeared first on BikePortland.org.



from Front Page – BikePortland.org http://ift.tt/2akBgiA

Portlander competing in self-supported around-the-world bike race

Nathan in Riverview Cemetery early this week.(Photo: Nathan Jones)

Nathan Jones in Riverview Cemetery earlier this week.
(Photo: Nathan Jones)

Portlander Nathan Jones, who some of you might recall as the energy and spirit behind the weekly Thursday Night Ride, is about to tackle a ride of a completely different magnitude: An 18,0 00 journey around the world.

It’s the World Cycle Race and Jones is currently in Belgium where the riders are about to start. To help fund his four-month journey Jones has set up a GoFundMe campaign where he’s already raised nearly $4,000 from 58 people.

Here’s more from Jones about the task that lies ahead:

“This will take me across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, North America, India, and the Malay Peninsula.

This will involve me pedaling on average for 18 hours a day. I will not have a support vehicle, the only support I will have will be the random trail angels, and those who are fortunate enough to be watching while I ride through. There will be other forms of support though, mostly family, friends, and great people I have yet to meet but are fascinated by the thrill of global bike racing.

This sort of racing is often referred to as self supported, and to a large part that remains very true. I will be all out on my own, with little more than my wits for months while I endlessly pour every ounce of my willpower into moving a bike aound the planet. That self support stops though in the form of the hundreds if not thousands of people willing to help support this crazy endeavor of mine. That can be anywhere from just watching my progress and relaying it to friends, to meeting me on route and buying a hotel, helping schedule with last minute flights, or helping to box up a bike.


There are endless, countless ways folks can support me without giving any cash. Just looking on in admiration and being inspired to dream bigger dreams is hugely appreciated. Life is really, terribly, tragically short, and my motto these days is “If I can’t aim for the moon, then I’ll aim for around the planet.” I appreciate being able to inspire folks and all the support that I receive in the process, I can’t thank people enough who are happy to see me fullfil my dreams and I hope to return the favor.”

The rules of the race are simple: Riders must pedal around the world by going either east or west without doubling back. There are two checkpoints they must visit and their progress is tracked via GPS.

Jones is no stranger to enduracing riding — whether he’s doing it himself or sharing his passion with others. In addition to his role with the Thursday Night Right (or “TNR” as regulars call it), Jones is also behind the Trans Am Bike Race and his latest project, the Steens Mazama 1000 just wrapped up last week.

To stay inspired by his journey and cheer him on as he goes, follow along via Facebook and Instagram.

Go Nathan! Good luck out there.

— Jonathan Maus, (503) 706-8804 – jonathan@bikeportland.org

Our work is supported by subscribers. Please become one today.

The post Portlander competing in self-supported around-the-world bike race appeared first on BikePortland.org.



from Front Page – BikePortland.org http://ift.tt/2a5IMiO

Bike and Build team rolls through Portland, changing lives all around

bike and build lot number
2016 Bike and Build riders Carmen Kuan and Kelsey Oesmann with local Habitat for Humanity worker Jake Antles at their work site in Cully Thursday.
(Photos: M.Andersen/BikePortland)

For the 15th year in a row, a crew of young adults on bikes pulled into Portland Wednesday almost ready to finish a cross-country bike trip designed to change the way they see their country.

Thursday’s time painting part of a new Habitat for Humanity house in the Cully neighborhood was one of 10 “build days” for the 24-person crew affiliated with the national organization Bike and Build. Part charity bike tour and part Americorps, Bike and Build’s mission is to “benefit affordable housing and empower young adults for a lifetime of service and civic engagement.”

Habitat for Humanity and similar home-building organizations rarely lack for volunteers. But as they finished up work near Northeast 60th and Killingsworth Thursday, Bike and Build participants said their person-hours aren’t really the point.

bike and build residents

“A lot of it is about kind of opening up people’s eyes to what’s going on across the country,” said Kelsey Oesmann, 25, a Washington D.C. resident. “In some places the land cost is really high; in others it’s policy restrictions.”

Each participant raises $4,500 for their tour, much of which is donated to affordable housing organizations and other Bike and Build partners. Riders can self-direct $500 to any affordable-housing organization.

But why the bikes?

“I think when you tell somebody that you’re biking across the country, it gets their attention,” Oesmann said. “A road trip wouldn’t.”

yorktown bike build
Getting ready to head out in Yorktown, Virginia, in May.
(Photo: Bike and Build)

Carmen Kuan of Athens, Georgia, said the 4,000-mile bike trip helps participants “develop grit and stamina” and gives them a physical connection to the country.

“You hear the wind whistling through the trees, you hear the hum of the tires on the pavement,” said Kuan, 25, who’s on leave from a research assistant internship. “You become so much more in tune with the environment around you.”

Anne-Davis-Ice-Cream
Anne Davis.
(Photo: Bike and build)

The crew that headed west out of Portland Friday morning was on Day 76 of a trip that started May 21 in Yorktown, Virginia. On July 13, two of their teammates, Anne Davis and Laura Stark, were struck by a woman driving a car on U.S. Highway 26 outside Idaho Falls, Idaho. Davis was killed and Stark remains hospitalized. The cause of the crash is still under investigation.

“Distracted driving is extremely dangerous to both yourself and to others,” said Kuan, speaking carefully after being asked about the incident. She described it as “a collision, not an accident.”

Bike and Build saw no rider fatalities from 2002 until 2010. Since 2010 there have been four.

More than 3,000 riders have participated over the years; each must complete 500 miles of personal training and a skills course before leaving. Many, including Kuan and Oesmann, are already bike commuters in their home towns.


There are 11 Bike and Build routes: eight cross-country and three shorter coastal ones. The Central United States route currently runs through Portland.

“They were great,” said Jake Antles, a construction crew leader for the Portland-area Habitat organization who helped supervise the build day Thursday. “Hard workers.”

Next week, the 24 active members of the team expect to finish their cross-country trip with a ceremonial front-wheel dip in the Pacific Ocean on Cannon Beach. Despite the long journey, the traumatic loss of a teammate and Thursday’s blistering heat, Oesmann said she isn’t eager for the trip to end.

“I’m not sure where my next steps will take me,” she said. “But this has definitely been a transformative experience.”

bike and build shirt

— Michael Andersen, (503) 333-7824 – michael@bikeportland.org

Our work is supported by subscribers. Please become one today.

The post Bike and Build team rolls through Portland, changing lives all around appeared first on BikePortland.org.



from Front Page – BikePortland.org http://ift.tt/2aD06MH

Fish warns of auto congestion as Council passes ‘Livable Streets Strategy’

City's rendering for the new Ankeny Plaza, a prototype of their new Livable Streets Strategy.

City’s rendering for the new Ankeny Plaza, a prototype of their new Livable Streets Strategy.

The City of Portland’s transportation bureau got past a key milestone on Wednesday when City Council voted to move forward with their Livable Streets Strategy.

Specifically, council supported the city’s $149,158 contract with consulting firm Nelson/Nygaard to come up with the framework of the strategy and set into motion what we’ve called “a new era of open streets.”

But during Wednesday’s otherwise uneventful council session we got a unexpected preview of the political debate that might lie ahead.

PBOT’s Livable Streets Strategy is an umbrella for several different new initiatives. It’s all about formalizing the inevitable (and long overdue) march toward Portland squeezing more potential out of its public right-of-way. Our streets are mostly dominated by cars — both in city policy and in daily reality. As Portland grows and non-car travel options become more popular and more necessary, we must transition away from the traditional, 1970s auto-centric planning paradigms. PBOT has already started this update process by reconfiguring roads to give more space to people to walk, bike and take transit and less space for private auto use.

But we have a very long way to go. And this work has taken on even more urgency with the launch of Biketown, our new bicycle transit system that already has over 7,000 riders.

Here’s a snip from the ordinance (PDF):

“Livable Streets Strategy will support innovation in the public right-of-way by opening Portland’s streets, parking spaces, plazas, and alleys to a range of events, programming, and physical infrastructure that reinforce the idea that public streets are public places to be enjoyed by all ages and abilities.”

A big part of the strategy will be to empower residents and business owners to propose and implement their own placemaking projects via community grants given out by the city.

After PBOT staff made a brief presentation about the program on Wednesday, Commissioner Nick Fish spoke up. He explained that he sees street management plans as fitting into two distinct camps: “streets and parking spaces,” and “plazas and alleys.” He’s worried about the “consequences” of the former and seems generally supportive of the latter.

Here are his comments in his own words (emphases mine), transcribed from the council meeting (you can also watch his comments in the video clip above):

“My sense is that the issues raised by livable streets as they apply to streets and parking spaces are different than the kind of issues that come up with plazas and alleys. In my own experience working with Commissioner Novick for example on the improvements along Division is that there’s a delicate balance between promoting the laudable goals of this program and also ensuring, for example, that business districts function.

We heard [in the Division conversation], for example, comments like ‘We’re really delighted to have these bioswales, but why did they have to be so big and take up two parking spaces? And why are they in a particular location and on and on.’


I just, as a commissioner, want to make sure that as we deal with the delicate issues of streets and parking spaces — which is a big flashpoint, and frankly, it’s increasingly difficult to get from point a to point b on our streets — that we use a broader lens than livable streets to make those decisions. And I have a different personal standard that I apply to alleys and plazas, because in some cases you’re activating orphan spaces.

The challenge with streets and parking places is we have competing demands. And I just want to put that on the record, a concern that we look at them differently. And frankly, while I now live in a rental apartment and walk to work and have ditched the car, when I am in a car and trying to get from point a to point b, there are huge consequences when we take a lane out of Naito or we close a street. And effectively what it means is that you just can’t get from here to there.

In my job there are times I have to travel by car. It’s just a necessity. So I want to just plant this flag that I’m going to have a different approach to this vis-a-vis streets and parking spaces, and want to know about the tradeoffs, then I would around plazas and alleys where I think there are some really big opportunities to create meaningful public places out of areas that are orphaned, or don’t serve a compelling transportation need. I want to put that on the record.”

By saying he wants to “put this on the record” and “plant this flag,” Fish is laying the rhetorical groundwork for future conversations and telegraphing to PBOT Commissioner Steve Novick and Mayor Charlie Hales that they’ll have to work hard for his vote.

“… I am committed to reducing congestion and unnecessary car idling.”
— Nick Fish, city commissioner

Fish’s comments also express clear concerns about Better Naito, PBOT’s partnership with Better Block to temporarily reconfigure the lanes on Naito Parkway. A successful three-month pilot project ends Sunday and Mayor Charlie Hales plans to ask Fish and the rest of council to use city money (an estimated $1.5 million) to make it permanent in the coming months.

Also notable in his comments: Fish appears fully supportive of new public plazas and innovative uses of our right-of-way, as long the spaces don’t impinge “compelling transportation needs.”

I followed up with the Commissioner after the meeting. When I asked what exactly he meant by “huge consequences” of Better Naito he said (via email), “What I have heard from my constituents is that it is important to balance the needs of all transportation modes. Improving circulation and safety, and expanding bike infrastructure, are not mutually exclusive goals.” And Fish, saying his opinion was informed by the city’s Climate Action Plan, wrote that, “I am committed to reducing congestion and unnecessary car idling.” 

It’s worth noting that Fish is the City Council liaison to Venture Portland, an organization that represents our 50 neighborhood business districts. As such, he wants to make sure business owners are at the table when PBOT considers making changes to the right-of-way (PBOT staff said they will be). Fish told PBOT staff that Portland’s neighborhood business owners are, “always struggling with that balance between getting customers in and out of the district and also wanting it to be a safe and welcoming place.”

When I asked what he meant by “ensuring that business districts function,” he said that he hears concerns from neighborhood business leaders about, “the cumulative impact of our decisions.”

“There is a cumulative impact of green street facilities, ROW temporary structures, parking removal and transportation mode additions,” he continued. “We want our business districts to be successful, and that means taking a holistic approach.”

Naito Parkway traffic observations -4.jpg
Better Naito in action on Thursday evening.
(Photo: J. Maus/BikePortland)

As for whether or not he’d support Better Naito if/when it comes to council in October, Fish said he’s looking forward to a briefing on traffic analysis and results of the pilot project and that he’d, “Keep an open mind.”

— Jonathan Maus, (503) 706-8804 – jonathan@bikeportland.org

Our work is supported by subscribers. Please become one today.

The post Fish warns of auto congestion as Council passes ‘Livable Streets Strategy’ appeared first on BikePortland.org.



from Front Page – BikePortland.org http://ift.tt/2anyAOy

Dangkinun Son - The pulling hand

Dangkinun son (당기는손) or the pulling hand refers to the arm/hand that is seemingly doing nothing
in the textbook applications of Taekwondo basic techniques. This is the hand on the hip in most techniques in Poomsae. While one hand is punching, striking of blocking the other hand is pulled back to the hip. We know based on the writings of Funakoshi (and several others) that this part of the technique is actually a very important active part of it and not something passively done for the sake of it. Nor is the hand placed on the hip to be "ready" for the next move (although that happens also sometimes). More often than not the other hand is checking the opponents arm, removing his defenses, pulling him off balance and generally opening the opponent up for a strike. Taekwondo is often said to be a simplified version of Japanese Karate, Japanese Karate being an already simplified version of Okinawan Karate. I think that the Taekwondo we generally see today is simplified in the extreme (albeit with a lot of added foot techniques), not because it was based on Japanese Karate, but because over time Taekwondo has been sportified and defanged in many ways to appeal to new students. This has worked a lot when looking at the number of students as the number one sucsess criteria, but in my eyes a lot has been lost over the years. The concept of the pulling hand is one of these things. Why I devote so much time on this concept you ask? It is one of the most distinguishing features of our basic techniques, and after reading Richard Chun`s 1976 book I again was firmly reminded of what has been lost.

The pulling hand as a concept has not been officially formalized in Taekwondo litterature, at least not the way it has been by Karate pioneers, but it is there in text if you care to read, and more importantly it is present in the pictures that Taekwondo masters have provided on the usage of basic techniques, even when they do not explain the pulling hand concept in the text is still shows up all  over the place in older Taekwondo litterature. The pulling hand is still demonstrated in contemporary litterature which I will demonstrate in this post, as well as the fact it was an integral part of Taek Kyon which is purpoted to be one of Taekwondo`s root martial arts. I will not go into the validity of this claim, I will however make the claim that if at least a few techniques of Taek Kyon was known to the Taekwondo masters I belive that it provides an interesting idea that Taek Kyon might have had more to do with the Korean view of application of the martial art they did "know" (most often Karate) than what we usually credit it to have. I will also demonstrate in this post that the pulling hand concept is an integral part of Taek Kyon.

A picture is said to be worth a thousand words, so I will let the Taekwondo masters speak for themselves in this blog post with only short commentaries of my own. First out is Son Duk Sung. He wrote two books on Taekwondo, the earliest of which was published in 1968 and co-written by Robert J. Clark. Son Duk Sung was the 2nd Kwanjang of Chung Do Kwan (replacing the founder Lee Won Kuk when he had to escape Korea for political reasons). Sun tells us about the pulling hand the same way that Choi Hong Hi tells us, faulty application of Newton`s law of motion. He does however demonstrate the "true" concept  of the pulling hand in some of his demonstrations. 


Below Son is demonstrating an application from a standard straight punch (with hand on the hip). You will note that he does not actually pull the hand back on the application, but he does check the opponents punch with the other hand. This is one of his applications from the forms he is demonstrating in the book.



Below you can see Son demonstrating an application for what we Call Dangkyo Teok Chigi today. This technique is found as the second technique in the Pyungahn Eedan form (Heian Nidan, Pinan Shodan). We have the technique in Taebaek Poomsae today. He does not actually use the other hand for grabbing the opponent and dragging them onto the punch, rather he uses his elbow to check the opponents incomming punch and redirect it leaving an opening for his own counter-punch.


Below youca see Son demonstrate the pulling hand as a way to both open up the opponents defenses, as well as pulling him off balance. This is how you will perhaps most often use the pulling hand concept. If you look closely on the grabbing hand you will notice that it is not "just" a grab. He relaxes his index finger, concentrating the gripping force into the most strong gripping fingers there are and giving himself a structural advantage grip-wise. Also the location of the grip should be noticed as it is not at a random place, but each finger seems to be pressing on a vital point on his wrist (although that might be difficult to see due to the sleeve).


Another straight punch demonstrated, but the other hand is in active use. Here it is redirecting the opponents limb so that a strike can be sneaked in under the opponents arm.


Below you can see the pulling hand used to pullthe opponent off balance, opening up the opponents defenses in the process. Again not the gripping hand itself, as the observations I gave earlier apply here as well. Pulling the opponent forwards like this offbalances the opponent, pulls him into Your strike, leaves him with great difficulty defending himself and opens up the vital Points on the base of the skull which is exploited by Son. It is a great example of a knife hand strike the way it should be Applied.



Now that we have seen Son Duk Sung demonstrating the pulling hand concept for us in his 1968 book, let ut keep to the 1960s (the very same year in fact) and let Sihak Henry Cho demonstrate the pulling hand concept to us. While Son was from a Chung Do Kwan lineage, Sihak Henry Cho was of a Ji Do Kwan lineage. Cho never gives a written explanation on the pulling hand, but he uses it in his demonstrations more often than he does not. While Son more often than not uses the hand on the hip simply as a hand placed at the hip, Cho about 70-80%  (an estimate only) of the time uses the pulling hand concept. These are just a few examples of the book. I am sure the regular Readers have seen many of them before, but bear with me on this as the pulling hand concept is an important one to drive home.

Below Cho is demonstrating a knife hand strike. His other hand is performing a check on his opponents arm. The end position as well as the chamber he must have used to get here strongly resembles the way Taekwondo today performs its knife hand guarding block. As Makki as a word opens up for more than a static block, this application could still bear the moniker "Sonnal guoderro makki".

 Below you see Cho demonstrating a knife hand strike with a pulling action. Remember my observations on Son Duk Sung`s grip? Note Cho`s grip here as well. Index finger relaxed, power focused on the grips strong points, grab performed seemingly pressing the opponents vital points on the wrist. At the time the book was written, the chamber for a knife hand block would be from the opposite ear on the inside of the chambering arm. Therefore this knife hand strike could be seen as a practical application for a knife hand block as it was performed in 1968.




Below you can once again see Cho demonstrate the pulling hand to pull the opponents limb out of the way and increase the Power of his own strike. The grabbing hand is just as interesting here as it was in earlier pictures.



Below the Dangkinun son is used to redirect the opponents limb, opening him up for a strike. Here the opponents Dobok sleeve is grabbed, not his arm, again demonstrating that the pulling hand does not necesarily need to grab and hold on to the actual arm. You use whatever you get your hand on.



Below Cho once again uses it as Funakoshi describes it should be used, pulling the opponents limb toward himself. His gripping method should once again be studied intently, and he demonstrates an interesting application that is almost straight out from Sipjin Poomsae near the end.


Same striking tool as in the last picture, but different technique and different way of using the pulling hand. Once again it is the sleeve being grabbed, not the actual arm. Note how it makes it difficult to defend against the incomming strike.




So we have seen that the pulling hand concept was in use often (at least in Cho`s case) in the late 60s. Therefore it stands to reason that the Koreans who studied in China and Japan brought this knowledge back (or they got it from their own fighting arts as we shall see a few examples of later). The next illustrations on the concepts are from Richard Chun`s taekwondo book dating from 1976, almost a decade later. He too uses the pulling hand concept remarkable often. It was one of the things that leaped out from the pages when I read through it a few days ago.


In the first example he uses the other hand to check the opponents punch as he delivers his own punch. This is very similar to the other two masters we have seen so far, and suggests that this was a common practise in Taekwondo back then. Richard Chun is from a Mu Duk Kwan lineage by the way, so eventhough we lookat three masters all teaching Taekwondo around the same time, they are all from different Taekwondo Kwan (schools).




Below you will see how he receives his opponents attack, grabs and pulls the opponent redirecting his opponents limb, and opening him up for a strike. Note the close distance between them as modern texts often demonstrates on a farther distance than we have seen these masters do.


As we have seen very often in this post the "non punching hand" or whatever you would like to call it (I call it the pulling hand) is used here to check the opponents arm yet again.



Below Chun is once again checking his opponents arm, closing him off so he has to struggle to defend himself, while he delivers a punch. The target seems to be just below the ear, which is a great spot to hit.


Below you will see an alternate application for ditjuga jireugi also known as "C punch", or a variation on Keumgang Momtong makki as seen in Taebaek Poomsae. Here the lower arm traps the opponents kick, while the upper arm delivers a devestating punch to the opponents head. Again not the close distance between them.

 Below you can once again see Richard Chun using the non active hand as a "check".


 Below you can see Chun`s pulling hand actually pulling the opponent into the strike. This could be an application from Keumgang Poomsae. He does not grab the opponents wrist in this case, only his sleave.


The pulling hands function is very well documented in Japanese sources, and we see it being used often in the writings of the early Taekwondo masters as late as 1976. Taekwondo`s Japanese and Chinese roots are well documented, but their own Korean martial arts heritage is not well documented, and if it is documented it is often fair to say a complete fabrication. That does not mean however that we completly discount the Korean martial arts as despite what you think were still alive at the time Taekwondo was formalized. It was not complete systems anymore, and Taek Kyon pioneers had to travel all around to gather enough knowledge to recreate Taek Kyon as it is known today (this is something that is written very little about). The point I am trying to make is that Taek Kyon or at least remnants of it would still be available to the Taekwondo masters when Taekwondo was formalized. How much was used if any? How did this influence the application knowledge of the pioneers if any? We do not know, but looking through a Taek Kyon book published in 1990 with older pictures we can see how the grabbing of the opponent while striking was used in Taek Kyon as well. Below are three techniques from the book. The first technique is similar to how the Kukkiwon will chamber and execute the momtong an makki or inward block. The end position is a little higher of course but I do find this interesting.


The second technique is reminisent of a knife hand strike as seen in Taegeuk Sam Jang. Han Sonnal Mok Chigi.

The Third technique once again resembles the inward block, but here it is delivered a little lower than the end position of the kukkiwon technique.


Does this mean that Taekwondo could have drawn from Korean sources as well as Japanese and Chinese sources? The founders of Taekwondo studied in Japan and China. Few if any of them had real experience of the Korean martial arts. However over time this knowledge might have been brought in again, and might have influenced some of the "changes" the different Kwan did with their techniques, as well as clarifications on basic technique standard of the Kukkiwon. This is all speculation on my part, but it is an interesting mental path to go down. Sadly few if anyone is researching this angle, since literature on Taek kyon and the Korean martial arts in English is vurtually non existant, and the Japanese and chinese sources are so well documented (and obvious).

What about modern days though? In the Kukkiwon textbook you do see plenty of instances where the pulling hand concept is still in use. This suggests that there has been an unbroken line of transmission from the Kwan until today. Using the other hand actively as opposed to passively is not only tactical and strategicly sound, it is also highly historical.








The above illustrations are all from the 2006 edition of the Kukkiwon Textbook. As the ways in which the pulling hand are mostly the same as covered earlier I think there is little need to comment further. Suffice to say that just because we have one hand on the hip while doing solo performance of the forms, it does not mean that the hand is passive. In application it has always been a case of using this hand actively in Taekwondo!






from Traditional Taekwondo Ramblings http://ift.tt/2ah73ig